Sunday 19 June 2016

Policy Rates; Is It Driven By A Divine Power ?

Policy rates is not something that the common folk would consider as a topic in their day to day life, especially in a country where there are many things to worry about as the sun does its daily chores quite unaffected by the long wait to bring the culprits to book and forfeit of assets of those who indulged in self-aggrandizement while in office, or the immunity given to the corrupt public officers and private deal makers. However during the recent past this highly technical term has been used to promulgate certain economic theories at its best while, sadly its being used to foster either personal agendas or political credos of certain fractions and individuals. This writer has reason to state so .

The policy rate of a country is a key monetary tool used to achieve macro economic objectives like inflation, consumption, growth and liquidity. The importance of the policy rates for an average citizen is that it could influence certain decision in the day to day life of average individual without knowing that such decision are made on the outcome of policy rate. Based on the signals given by the policy rates, general interest rates of the country at which our consumption, savings & investment decision are made by the individuals, is moved in either direction. It is not the result of wishful thinking of any average person as the decisions on policy rates should be taken after careful study of the relevant dynamics and indicators prevailing in the economy .In sri Lanka it is the Monetary board of the central bank who takes the decisions after observing the recommendations made by Money and Banking division of the Economic Research Department (ERD) of the Central Bank- the apex organization that handles the monetary and fiscal policies of the country . For recommending policy rate decision, the ERD observes large numbers of indicators and use variety of economic analysis. The bank has employed its best brains for the above process & has invested large number of resources for building up the decision making capability of the ERD.

The policy rates, in contrasts to criticism can not be decided through a haphazard process as it directly influences the market interest rates which in turn influence the key economic indicators such as inflation, bank interests rates , exchange rates etc

As mush as the term “policy rates” has become a vibe in the socio political domain, despite the general public is not quite interested to know, some individuals and political parties are seemingly making attempts to paint a picture that will favor their agenda and that will create a total wrong picture of the economy. Strangely some of the critics of the policy rates are respected individuals who have worked directly or indirectly with the central bank, who are presenting a view that will reverse the practices that they have followed during their tenure /service with the CB.

One such argument is that the policy rates should be used as the sole tool to control market interests rates which is quite questionable as there should be some stability in policy rates in order for any industry to work with predictability. Therefore policy rates can not be changed as and when one would wish to do and on the other hand the policy rates are not decided months ahead , it is decided as per the prevailing status of the economy and in the best interests of the same economy meaning that policy rates are not changed as a regular practice. It happens when the need arises to do so. In simple terms, one cannot expect the Monetary Board to take panic decisions, increasing the policy rates in one sitting & decreasing it soon after. Rather, CB would wait & see if the signal coming through careful observation of certain variables are pointing a permanent situation. This is the practice of the other Central banks in the world.in this regards, Central Banks have many occasion disappointed patientless market participants.
 
Further another proposition put forth by these commentators is that policy rates are only decided by the monetary board and the governor and the respected members of the monetary board would leak out the information months ahead which is a diabolical lie and misleading the public. Firstly, the monetary board is advised by the relevant department in the CB and secondly the respected members of the monetary board would not act in an unethical manner by leaking sensitive information, thereby risking loss of reputation which they have built over the years.

Meanwhile contradictory arguments can also be seen where the same writer recommends lowering the policy rates in one piece of writing and immediate raising of the policy rates on the subsequent article.
The criticism at its worst status, is directed towards the governor of the CB and the rest of the monetary board that they would leak the policy rates to their friends relatives or any other known parties which does not bear any truth as explained above. The attempts are clearly made to drive a point home that the incumbent monetary board takes a sole discretion on deciding the policy rates which is an attempt to tarnish the reputation of the members of the monetary board .

Finally some attempts are made to show that the policy rates are decided by using a divine power which perhaps would have been done by the same critics without paying due attention to the realistic status of the economy in order to pacify and ratify political agendas of the day when they were working with the Central Bank or any other connected organization .Otherwise how would such erudite critics come up with totally misleading and irrelevant arguments ? Let us not believe in divine powers to run the economy or formulate policies or relevant “rates and numbers”, instead let us first understand the real status of the economy and move forward. (ColomboTelegraph)

Home                    Sri Lanka ThinkTank-UK (Main Link)

Sunday 12 June 2016

Financial Profligacy Of An Omnibus Cabinet: Can Sri Lanka Afford This Scandal?

In September last year in a piece I titled “An Omnibus Cabinet & Outvoted Parliamentarians: Can the Economy Afford to Maintain This Colony of Prodigals?” (Colombo Telegraph, September 7, 2015) I posed a question, “Can anyone tell the people the estimated total cost of this colony of artificially elevated political gentry?”. Ten months have passed since then, and the public auditors should have some rough idea to answer my question.

I raise that question once again in the light of the recent request for 1.1 billion rupees (equivalent to roughly US$ 2.5 million) allocation to import 42 “luxury cars” for some ministers and their deputies. While the government policy of economic liberalism is pushing down the throats of ordinary people the so called programs of austerity what moral right have the rulers to indulge in financial extravagance?

Sri Lanka is sinking in national debt and foreign lenders are having a strangle hold in the economy’s assets. Isn’t there a national need to economise expenditure without hurting the ordinary families? With the decline in oil prices and economic downturn in the Arab countries foreign remittances from Sri Lankan expatriates which tranquilised the economic pain of many families is also disappearing fast. It is time the country look for an alternative economic model to make ends meet and protect its independence. The reform should start at the top with the President, the Prime Minister and their coteries of political functionaries.

It is in this context that I also want to raise the issue of the economic viability of decentralised political administration in Sri Lanka. What is the actual cost of maintaining all those provincial councils, their chief ministers and their officialdom? What useful service are these political parvenus performing to deserve their status? The recent incident about the public behaviour of a provincial chief minister has exposed the danger of having too many petty chiefs consuming too much resources and power with too little knowledge about public decorum and behaviour. The periodical elections conducted to choose these chiefs and their lackeys on top of the cost of conducting national elections to the parliament obviously impose unbearable strain on the public purse with incommensurable return.

Whatever the criticisms that we may level against our former British colonial masters we should be fair to admit that they left us with an efficient public service with rules and regulations of accountability. An efficient Government Agent system with a prudently structured parliamentary cabinet will more than adequately compensate the loss of all provincial councils and their mediocre administration. In the public arena Sri Lanka is recklessly wasting too much precious financial resources for too little return.

Unlike in many developing countries Sri Lanka, thanks to an internationally competitive education system in recent past has produced a politically literate constituency of a substantial size. It has no doubt an enormous capacity and capability to initiate political reforms which will eliminate some of the injustices and economic waste in the current system. The thought provoking contributions by a wide range of talented writers to this journal are just one index of this healthy phenomenon. Unfortunately the system has given prominence to the mediocre at the expense of the talented. It is time for rationalisation of the country’s political structure and administration. Will this constituency come forward to lead the agitation? (Ameer Ali)