Tuesday 22 September 2015

Sri Lankan currency falls sharply

An International Monetary Fund (IMF) team visiting Sri Lanka to discuss the country’s budget praised the floating of the rupee, which is a longstanding IMF demand. A statement last Friday declared: “The mission welcomes the CBSL’s (Central Bank) recent decision to cease setting daily spot prices for the rupee and let market forces play a greater role in determining the exchange rate.”


Thursday 13 August 2015

We offer Mercy to Mankind; M. R. Mohamed says










See more updates;

MRM's School in FB>>>

 Home

Social Market Economy Vs. Social Market Socialism


Social Market Economy may be a familiar term or concept but the other concept might be new. As I perceive it, both concepts have very similar economic components but there is one significant difference. What is it? Social Market Economy will continue to link the distribution of distributable output significantly to the ownership of means of production. On the contrary “Social Market Socialism” will separate the distribution of distributable output significantly from the ownership of means of production. This difference is not just theoretical; instead it has very far reaching practical impact. The impact is related to the efficiency of the economy. Let us discuss this matter further.Read more>>>

Wednesday 22 July 2015

The Greek Tragedy

Tragedy is etched into the Greek psyche, whether it’s the fall of Troy, Macedonia, Thrace or Thessaly, throughout Greek history tragedy has been a constant feature. Located on the edge Europe, Greece came to dominate the ‘known Western world’ for a good portion of Europe’s ancient history. In the ancient era, Greece became a maritime city-state and invented a culture oriented towards commerce. Greece was the West’s first advanced civilization (Athens) and produced its first empire (ancient Macedon).

Modern Greece was central for the powers during both WW1 and WW2. After WW2, the countries position on the edge of the Cold war between the US and the Soviet Union led to aid, finance and arms flowing into the country. Greece joined the EU in 1981 and subsequently joined the Eurozone in 2001. By becoming a member of the Eurozone, Greece’s credit rating was considered the same as Europe’s heavy weights as they were all now part of the same union. This gave Greece access to finance that it would otherwise not be privileged to and it also sold Bonds at low rates of interest.

Rather than wait until it had enough money to fund its expenditure Greece decided it would rather borrow the money today and as taxes come in over the years it would repay the debt. Due to this a boom in the Greek economy took place, from 2000 – 2007 Greece was the fastest growing economy in the Eurozone as capital flooded the country.  Successive Greek governments went on spending sprees, creating in turn many public sector jobs, new pension plans and many other social benefits. The spending addiction included high-profile projects such as the 2004 Athens Olympics, which went well over budget.

When the Global economic crisis exploded in 2008, this exposed the sovereign debt crisis and the untenable Greek position. The problem Greece faced was that it had accumulated debts of over €300 billion, the government budget was only €91 billion from an economy which was worth only €240 billion. Greece’s debt is more than the whole economy put together. Greece today, does not have an economy that produces sufficient wealth that can repay such debt. The problem with deficit spending and debt fuelled growth is at some point the debt will have to be repaid. Most governments do not worry about the deadline day as it will always be in a future term with another government. For Greece that last decades debt is now due for repayment, but the kitty is sitting empty.

The current crisis caused three problems:
  1. The economic crisis caused unemployment, which led to a fall in tax receipts, this is what Greece has wanted continues bailouts for.
  2. Greece has struggled to meet its debt obligations to the IMF and EU banks, it has attempted to negotiate with them and the current impasse is due to its creditors refusing to budge any more on repayments.
  3. Over 20 billion euros left the Greek banking system since December 2014. On March 18, Greek banks saw deposit outflows of between 300 million and 400 million euros — the highest in a single day. Greece turnedto the EU for help in this area, for bailouts as cash injections. The current crisis is due to the EU led by Germany imposing excessive demands in return for bailout cash.
The German Straightjacket 

As far as the leader of the EU is concerned, Germany, the Greeks deserve what they are getting. As far as they are concerned, Greece lied with its statistics to join the EU, since then it went on a spending spree rather than make prudent decision for the countries long term prosperity. The Greeks need to be taught a lesson for this hubris, which the Germans plan to extract, irrespective of the pain it will cause.

For the years the EU has been providing hand-outs to Greek banks and rescheduling the debt obligations Greece has, the Germans expect Greece to slash its spending, completely cut welfare spending, cut the Civil Service and make debt repayments the priority, irrespective of the pain this would cause the average Greek. This austerity package which has caused Greek unemployment to hover around is 26% of the workforce, whilst over 50% of its youths under the age of 25 are unemployed.

The austerity measures imposed by Germany has led to social, economic and political chaos. This is why the Greeks leaving the Euro and potentially the EU, a ‘Grexit,’ is considered a real prospect as Germany has shown no signs of compromising on its position.

The current stand-off was due to Germany wanting further cuts to pensions in return for bailout cash. The Greek government refused as pensioners have been pushed into poverty due to previous cuts in pensions. The Greek government attempted to call Germany’s bluff with a referendum, but Germany refused to change its demands.

Five years into the crisis, Greek voters have opposed the continuation of austerity measures. With the referendum result Greece has moved beyond negotiation to directly confronting its lenders. With similar anti-EU parties expected to do well in upcoming elections in Spain and France Germany and the other nations owed money by Greece remain wedged to their position of bailouts for austerity.

Living together separately

The Eurozone crisis has proved that monetary union cannot work without political union. Indeed with the likes of Germany and France now defining the government budget of Greece this is a forced political union or political union by the back door in the Eurozone. Unconstrained Government spending by some countries in the Eurozone has undermined the monetary union because a single monetary policy is now not practically viable across the whole union. Consequently the European Central Bank rate is too low for the risk of lending to Greece and too high for lending to Germany which is why there is a big divergence between German bond yields and Greece yields.

The Eurozone is also forcing international trade to accept that a Euro is worth the same in Germany and Greece when that is not the reality due to wide divergence in key economic fundamentals between the two countries. In effect exchange rates should be lower in Greece to reflect its economic weakness but higher in Germany due to its economic strength.

The Eurozone crisis has been blamed on the peripheral economies like Greece and Ireland but is a symptom of the wider crisis in capitalism. Ultimately economically stronger and politically more powerful economies will dominate the Eurozone parasitically exploiting the weaker members. Germany and France will dominate the likes of Greece controlling all her national interests or they will abandon her rather than allow the weakest states to weaken the Eurozone, the Union or its most powerful states.

Conclusions 

So what lies ahead for Greece? The Greeks for the moment want to end austerity but want to remain with the EU. A ‘grexit’ it would seem is not something the Greeks are interested in, as they see their future within the EU, not outside. But remaining with the EU will be extremely painful for Greece as France and Germany will extract numerous concessions in order to teach it a lesion and send a signal to other indebted EU nations.

The EU was meant to unite the continent and lead to prosperity. With the continents history of wars, uniting the economies of the continent was meant to mend Europe’s bloody history. But we have seen with the Greek debacle that the whole continent views the Greeks as different to them, and quite possibly even a future without them. (Adnan Khan)

Home

Tuesday 30 June 2015

Gold Standard: The future for a stable global currency

With the European sovereign debt crisis threatening to dissolve the Eurozone and the US with record budget and trade deficits the world is facing a monetary crisis. 

Central to the sovereign debt, housing and financial derivatives bubbles has been the provision of cheap and abundant credit. Money that has been simply manufactured from the keyboards or printing presses of Central bankers. As long as the financial system allows the effective counterfeiting of paper currency to meet ever increasing central spending – inflation and instability will ensue. 

The only policy option of the politicians and bankers has been to print more money. This currency devaluation is a last desperate attempt to engender recovery. It is time to consider again alternatives to this unstable fiat paper regime. 
With the thorough discrediting of much of the worlds banking system throughout the recent crisis there is an opportunity to re-examine the monetary pillars of western banking. This new paper from Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain examines the question of can and should the world return to the gold standard. 

The debate is started by setting out the 10 main arguments against the gold standard. We examine these arguments and present counter arguments to explore whether they are still valid, and whether they are insurmountable in the quest for a more stable currency in an unstable world. (HTB)

Read Full Report from here>>>

Monday 8 June 2015

The Environmental Problem Its Causes & Islam’s Solution

In relation to the ongoing debate on the climate and the increasing focus on the condition of the environment, HT in Denmark has issued a booklet titled “The Environmental Problem – Its Causes & Islam’s Solution”.


The booklet points out the cultural causes behind the incompetence of the Western capitalist states in solving the environmental problem. It highlights the major industrial countries’ erroneous diagnosis and treatment of the environmental problem, and it clarifies that the solutions of the Western great powers practically serve the interests of their large industries at the expense of the environment. Furthermore, the booklet explains the Islamic view on the environment, as well as the way in which the institutions of the coming Islamic Khilafah-state will deal with the environmental problem. (HTB)

Read full pdf Report from here>>>

Home              Sri Lanka Think Tank-UK (Main Link)

FIFA Crisis A Product Of Capitalist Culture


A corporate giant has, not for the first time, found it’s top administrators guilty of corruption. Following investigations from the FBI, FIFA has been charged with bribery and corruption in World Cup bidding as well as widespread bribery in sports marketing deals. Many of FIFA’s top officials have been charged with 47 counts of fraud, racketeering and money laundering conspiracies.


Considering the ubiquity, scale, sophistication and overwhelming frequency of corruption, The FIFA crisis cannot just be dismissed as an anomaly or be viewed as mere misbehaviour from the top officials – especially considering the fact that this corruption has been found to date back to 1991. The thoughts and motivations prevailing in the midst of these corruption cases needs to be examined with the view of identifying the common denominator in all such cases. Questions need to be asked as to why individuals and large corporations are seeking to exploit any and every opportunity for monetary gain? Be it in the form of corruption or otherwise.


David Cameron atop his white steed of forthrightness from the mountain of morality backed calls for Sepp Blatter to step down. As it happens though, the not so squeaky clean record of the incumbent and previous governments includes highlights such as; cash for honours, cash for questions and cash for access. Thus showing that the Fifa scandal is not some isolated case of corruption far removed from western countries like Britain and America.


In February of this year Malcolm Rifkind, the Tory party whip, was suspended in a cash for access scandal, alongside Jack Straw. This is an ongoing tradition, after the general election in 2010, David Cameron held dinners for various donors including hedge fund managers and CEO’s; suggesting that influence was bought through donations. Peter Crudas, former Tory Party treasurer was indicted explicitly for offering access to the ears of senior party members for cash. However, this is a cross party phenomenon, Tony Blair who promised he would be ‘purer than pure’ was questioned by police for offering peerages for cash. While these may verge on the barely legal, the MP expenses scandal most certainly wasn’t. The limited moral outcry of that particular scandal resulted in Eric Pickles, who spent over £70,000 of tax payer money on tea and biscuits, being awarded a knighthood. Corruption has extended past being a back alley practice and has now become an avenue for the elite to get what they want.


Lobbying, cash for access, donations and cash for honours are all part for the course. With widespread mutual engagement in bribery, opportunities for corruption are now found everywhere – be it on a large or small scale. The reaction from the US would leave one believing that a more incorruptible society could never have existed. However, in an examination of the Bush jr. administration it is very difficult to find an employee not reeking of corruption. On taking office, Dick Cheney refused to divest his shares from Haliburton, whom he had worked for up until 2000. Something which was not only highly immoral, but was also highly illegal. From 2001-2003 Cheney was paid a total of $3,448,923 by Haliburton. Haliburton won a no bid contract with a ‘cost-plus’ clause to ‘rebuild Iraq’. I’m sure that the two aren’t connected! This was only one case of corruption in the Bush jr. administration.


It is not the scale of bribery that matters but it is the culture itself that is the problem. Like all deeply entrenched cultures, corruption is based on ideas and thoughts which form a corrupt mentality. It also follows that the corruption culture cannot be something random or a natural occurrence but rather is influenced and nurtured. In the case of FIFA and the other cases cited above, it’s how business and politics is done. Influence is sold to the highest bidder through dubious and often illegal channels and the menacing root of corruption is shameless material gain. Ethical thinking, fairness and consideration for people can never be synchronised with materialism, personal benefit and greed. An atmosphere of materialism not only acts as a catalyst for corruption but breeds it – such that its occurrence is inevitable. The top officials in FIFA involved in corruption are just a natural by-product of the institution and insidious materialism that exists within capitalism. (HTB)

Home              Sri Lanka Think tank-UK (Main Link)